"It's asking a great deal that things should appeal to your reason as well as your sense of the aesthetic." W. Somerset Maugham, 'Of Human Bondage', 1915 English dramatist & novelist (1874 - 1965)
"Who knows what form the forward momentum of life will take in the time ahead or what use it will make of our anguished searching. The most that any one of us can seem to do is fashion something--an object or ourselves--and drop it into the confusion, make an offering of it, so to speak, to the life force."
Ernest Becker, The Denial of Death

Sunday, October 10, 2010

America's School Systems

Yet, another fucking national debate on schools in America.

And they still have it wrong...here's the jackass quote from the article:

"So, where do we start? With the basics [always back to some fucking basic, PE]. As President Obama has emphasized, the single most important factor determining whether students succeed in school is not the color of their skin or their ZIP code or even their parent's income--it is the quality of their teacher."

[by the way, if you don't think money fucking matters--you're dead wrong]

Here, what's the difference between these two questions:

Do teachers make a difference in childrens' lives?
Can a teacher make a difference in a child's life?

The answer to the first question is, no, and that is as it should be.
The answer to the second is, yes, it's possible.

Of course, we have to go back to actual question and take it more at face value. Let's read that one section again: "...whether students succeed in school..." [my emphasis].

Not succeed in life, but in school. Are those mutually exclusive? I think so. One isn't necessarily predicated on the other.

And of course the article goes on bring up, yet again, that immeasurable of immeasurables in the current public education system: performance. How do you measure a teacher's performance? Isn't it measured by the % of kids in their classes who pass the state mandated standardized tests? After all, why else have mandated standardized tests.

In the work force, most employees leave because of a boss not the company because their boss, basically, sucks at managing them. Now, there are a lot of shitty bosses and while that may determine whether you stay at the company or not, the boss won't determine if you are successful at what you do (politics aside and not using "moving up the ladder" as a measure of success).

All this being said, it doesn't mean that quality teachers aren't needed nor that our educational system needs changes. There are many things that can be done (not in the scope of this post--but go to your local bookstore and head to the Education section and you'll find all kinds of books by authors with all kinds of ideas on how to change it..we certainly are not short of ideas).

Now, I'm going to throw out an idea that I have not really fleshed out yet but I think we really need to re-think the purpose of our public education system. What exactly are we trying to achieve? A better work force? Better citizens? Again, are these mutually exclusive?

It's a great topic of conversation not lacking opinions, but seriously lacking an constructive movement. And the latest "national debate" will be like the others--a bunch of bullshit will be spewed and nothing constructive will be done--oh, I'm sure something will be done but I guarantee it won't be constructive.

No comments: